Lynn

Live and in person at Lighthouse Artspace, 1 Yonge Street, Toronto, Ont. An Ouside the March Production, presented by Starvox Entertainment, in Association with Modern Times Stage Company, with support from Hilltop Studios and the BMO Lab. Plays until July 2.

Creator, performer and co-director, Sébastien Heins

Co-director, Mitchell Cushman

Dramaturg and story editor, Rosamund Small

Set designed by Anahita Dehbonehie

Sound designed by Heidi Chan

Lighting designed by Melissa Joakim

Project designer, Laura Warren

Costume designer, Niloufar Ziaee

Lead game developer, Aidan Wong

A love-letter of a show from a devoted son to his devoted mother, using video games, among other things, to tell the story.

When actor/creator Sébastian Heins was a teenager, his mother bought him his first Game Boy. He was obsessed with playing video games. As his mother drove the car Sébastian Heins sat in the backseat playing video games on his Game Boy.

It’s obvious from the narrative of No Save Points that Heins is devoted to his family, and his mother in particular. From his description Heins’ mother is calm, confident, determined, joyful, loving, pragmatic, accomplished (she sells real estate) and fearless in dealing with her challenges. The most obvious challenge is living with Huntington’s Disease (HD). It’s a progressive brain disorder caused by a defective gene. This disease causes changes in the central area of the brain, which affect movement, mood and thinking skills. There is no cure.  

His mother was born and raised in Jamaica. When Heins was growing up he had no desire to go there and investigate his roots. That changed in his 20s when he went to Jamaica to his mother’s town. He was walking along a street and saw a woman who had the same ‘unusual’ walk as his mother, jerky, seemingly unsteady. As the woman got closer he saw that she looked exactly like his mother. In fact, she was his aunt.

For a time his mother’s unsteady walk was thought to be an inner ear issue affecting balance. When his mother was tested it was discovered she had Huntington’s Disease and so did his aunt. It’s hereditary. To see if the HD gene was passed on to Heins he would have to do a test, and, no, I’m not telling if he had the test or the results—see the show for yourself, and you should.

So what does this all have to do with a show that is heavy on technology and video games?

Sébastian Heins has fashioned a show that is for people familiar with video games and those who are not. In the first segment Heins introduces his love of Game Boy etc. and announces that four people have been picked from the audience, who have indicated a love of the video game format. They are each introduced and are seated on platforms, given their own specially formatted Game Boy and when called upon, will operate the buttons etc. that will then activate a slight ‘charge’ in a belt that he wears that then affects his movements. This gives the audience a sense of the randomness of movement that his Mother experiences.

In another segment Heins introduces four video games that have been especially created for No Save Points, each connected to the issues his Mother experiences. They are named: “Hopeful Monster, co-conspirator, Damien Atkins; Windrush Returns, co-conspirator, Rouvan Silogix; Miasma, co-conspirator, Aylwin Lo; and The Itinerary co-conspirator, Kami King. Heins is involved in each game. He stands behind a scrim (he’s visible to the audience) onto which is projected the video icon of each game. Those who want to be involved in “playing” the game put up their hand in the audience and are given a device to move the icon either left, right or to jump. Heins will copy the movement of the icon behind the scrim, assuming the device works—at one point a participant said, “Move to the right”, the device doesn’t work. It’s a testament to Sébastian Heins’ abilities as an actor that he is so dexterous and present in the game and the show that he can easily adapt to any glitch (including the noise of a cell phone going off at an inopportune time—more on that later).

Some audience members were more adept at the video game than others, knowing when and how to move the icon and therefore Heins, forward, backward and to jump. If I have a quibble it’s that at times the games playing went on a bit too long. The real heart of the show is the heart of Sébastian Heins and his mother. The perfect melding of game and personal story involved “The Itinerary.” Sébastian Heins asked his mother what was on her bucket list when her health started to deteriorate. She wanted to go to Egypt. He would make it happen. He was determined. But the reality was that his mother was not sure she could do it and insisted it be cancelled.

In the video game of “The Itinerary” a character is in outer space and the space ship is hit by a meteor and the air supply is compromised and the character has only so many hours before the air runs out. The itinerary is of how the character spends his last hours. Looking at pictures of himself and his Mother catches ones breath; puts a face to the urgency of the situation and squeezes the heart.

No Save Points is a herculean project of technical complexity, theatrical ingenuity and clever stagecraft thanks to all concerned especially co-director Mitchell Cushman. But the heart and soul of the piece belongs to the grace of Sébastian Heins and his fearless mother. It was an honour to be in your company.

An Ouside the March Production, presented by Starvox Entertainment, in Association with Modern Times Stage Company, with support from Hilltop Studios and the BMO Lab.

Plays until July 2, 2023.

Running time: 2 hours.

About that annoying cell phone.

God I hate those damned, noisy cellphones going off in a theatre. How can you not hear the announcement to turn them off? In this case there was no announcement but still….

About a half hour into the show a strange beeping sound was heard near me. INFURIATING! It went on and on. “TURN THE DAMNED THING OFF” I’m saying to myself. It stopped then beeped again. Sébastian Heins was gracious about it. The sound was close. It was coming from my feet. From my backpack. MY GOD—the fool with the turned on cell phone was me! I quickly pulled the zip to open it, but I have a tear in the zipper (gotta get that fixed), and it jammed. Until I finally got it open, saw that it was an international call from a friend in Australia where it is tomorrow already and when I tapped the red phone icon to turn it off, nothing happened. (Hello technology). I tapped harder. Nothing. The nice younger person next to me fiddled and finally the offending noise stopped. I am SOOOOO embarrassed and apologetic. All the folks connected to the show who approached me were gracious and classy. Needless to say, it will never happen again. Truly.

{ 2 comments }

Life and in person at the Shaw Festival, Niagara-on-the-Lake, Ont. Plays until Oct. 8, 2023.

www.shawfest.com

Written by Tom Stoppard

Adapted from Einen jux will er sich machen by Johann Nestroy

Directed by Craig Hall

Set and costumes by Christina Poddubiuk

Lighting by Kimberly Purtell

Original music by Alessandro Juliani

Sound by Mike Rinaldi

Projections by Jamie Nesbitt

Cast: Jason Cadieux

Kristin Frank

Patrick Galligan

Élodie Gillett

Alexandra Gratton

Claire Jullien

Graeme Kitagawa

Julie Lumsden

Sanskruti Marathe

Mike Natadewski

Drew Plummer

Ric Reid

Jonathan Tan

Taurian Teelucksingh

Lindsay Wu

It’s a farce  of slapstick shenanigans, mistaken identities, malapropismsdouble entendres, and romantic complications. But I found Craig Hall’s direction less inventive and more overt in moving people faster with little at stake. The pace was too slow for farce. Fine acting by Mike Nadajewski and Ric Reid. But over-all a disappointment.

On the Razzle was written by Tom Stoppard which premiered at the Royal National Theatre, London in 1981. It is an adaptation of the 1842 Viennese play Einen Jux will er sich machen by Johann Nestroy. It’s been adapted twice by Thornton Wilder. The most notable The Matchmaker, was later adapted into Hello, Dolly!  Stoppard’s adaptation eliminates the Dolly character.

Herr Zangler (Ric Reid), a bit of a buffoon of an upscale grocery store in a small Austrian village, plans to marry the proprietor of a women’s clothing shop in Vienna. He arranges to send his niece Marie (Lindsay Wu) to his sister-in-law in Vienna, Miss Blumenblatt (Claire Jullien) to protect her from the penniless Sonders who is courting her.

As Zangler departs for Vienna, Zangler entrusts the operation of his business to his wily head clerk, Weinberl (Mike Nadajewski), and his naive apprentice, Christopher (Kristi Frank), but they decide to go “on the razzle” to Vienna—a trip of free-wheeling adventure and probably drinking. You can imagine it.  They all meet Zangler on the way and spend lots of time trying to escape his gaze.

Circumstances escalate and propel the two and Mr. Zangler and his intended into the same restaurant. Hiding becomes paramount for Weinberl and Christopher. High jinks seem a natural result.  

It’s a farce  of slapstick shenanigans, mistaken identities, malapropismsdouble entendres, and romantic complications. But since it’s Tom Stoppard, it’s also supremely literate, lots of puns, intellectual gymnastics with language and ideas. Facts, language and humour should wiz by. You can’t wait for the audience to get it because that slows down the pace. I got the sense that is what director Craig Hall did—slowed down the pace so the audience could keep up. Deadly.

There is a lot of hard work on that stage. Farce and slapstick are hard work—I must confess- farce is not my favourite kind of comedy. Too frenzied and frantic and complicated. All I want to do is say stop and sort this out. That said there is fine work by Mike Nadajewski as Weinberl. He is serious, smart, calculating and has comic talent in his fingers. Nadajewski is such an inventive comedic actor, he never stops delving into the heart of his part to find clues and humour.  Ric Reid as Zangler also is serious and full of malapropisms. That seriousness and those malapropisms are magically delivered.

But I found Craig Hall’s direction less inventive and more overt in moving people faster with little at stake. I found the production a bit tedious—that’s deadly in farce.

The Shaw Festival presents:

Playing until Oct. 8, 2023.

Running time: 2 hours, 20 minutes (one intermission)

www.shawfest.com

Prince Caspian

Live and in person at the Shaw Festival, Niagara-on-the-Lake, Ont. Play until Oct. 8, 2023.

www.shawfest.com

Adapted by the stage by Damien Atkins

Based on the novel by C.S. Lewis from the Narnia series.

Directed by Molly Atkinson

Set and costumes by Cory Sincennes

Lighting by Jareth Li

Original music and sound by Alessandro Juliani

Cast: Kyle Blair

Fiona Byrne

Shane Carty

Patty Jamieson

Qasim Khan

Andrew Lawrie

Michael Man

Marla McLean

Jade Repeta

Sanjay Talwar

Kiana Woo

Prince Caspian is the fourth book in the eight books of the Chronicles of Narnia seriesso beloved of Tim Carroll, the Shaw Festival’s Artistic Director. It’s a complex series of stories involving the four Pevensie siblings who magically found their way to Narnia through a wardrobe. There they had adventures with queens, Telmarine soldiers, dealing with horrible prophecies and being embraced by Aslan a magical lion with great insight and powers.

In Prince Caspian the siblings try to save the Prince from a prophecy in which he will be killed by his uncle who wants to be king. They encounter all manner of difficulty, getting lost, looking for markers, fighting soldiers, encountering dwarves, and looking for Aslan for help.

The set and costumes by Cory Sincennes are impressive, especially a majestic, magical tree up stage centre, that sometimes takes on a life of its own. The large ‘puppet’ of Aslan, carefully manipulated by Qasim Khan.

The four Pevensie children are played by adult actors: Peter (Kyle Blair), Edmund (Andrew Lawrie), Susan (Marla McLean) and Lucy (Kiana Woo). They are all extremely serious, with Peter (Kyle Blair) leading the way, and Lucy (Kiana Woo), the youngest, who adds a touch of whimsy.

The children all stick together to solve the various problems of finding their way home—Peter leads them in the wrong direction but they don’t chide him. Kyle Blair as Peter is contrite and humbled. When Lucy says that she sees Aslan in the distance, the others can’t see him. They gently question her if she really saw him, if they can’t. Peter says, solemnly, “if they can’t seem him, does he exist?” C.S. Lewis injecting a bit of religious philosophy into his ‘children’s series’ questioning the existence of God.

Molly Atkinson has directed Prince Caspian in such a reverential way the pace is plodding. Characters stand in a row and talk to each other or the audience. The production lacks lightness.

Presented by the Shaw Festival.

Plays until Oct. 8, 2023.

Running time: 2 hours, 15 minutes, (1 intermission)

www.shawfest.com

{ 0 comments }

Live and in person at the Streetcar Crowsnest, in the Studio Theatre, presented by Crow’s Theatre and Fire and Rescue Team. Plays until June 25, 2023.

www.crowstheatre.com

Written and performed by Alex Bulmer

Directed by Lean Cherniak

Set, props and costumes by Victoria Wallace

Lighting by David Degrow

Sound by Deanna H. Choi and Thomas Ryder Payne

Line Feeder and performer, Enzo Massara

Joyful. Enlightening. Illuminating.

The show began on the dot of ‘on time’ when the ticket said it would begin. This was just the start of aspects of this show that would be astonishing. The show is for sighted and sight impaired people.

Perceptual Archaeology (Or How to Travel Blind) is written and performed by Alex Bulmer who began losing her sight to retinitis pigmentosa when she was 19. She’s now in her 50’s. She has not stopped performing and creating because of her blindness. She seems emboldened by it even embracing it.

She wanted to become a blind travel writer like James Holman (15 October 1786 – 29 July 1857), who was a travel writer and adventurer in England. She decided to ‘follow’ in Holman’s footsteps and take trips that he did. The show in fact is composed of five parts that come from five of Alex Bulmer’s travel pieces.

She travelled to Germany with her sighted friend Michael. She recounts the sounds around her; going out on her own; being concerned when she was separated from Michael at one point by what seemed like a riot. She realized her ambitions were too great for this trip and it ended early. But she didn’t quit. She went to Graceland (even though James Holman didn’t) and took in all that entailed about Elvis Presley. She travelled the whole Camino trail in Spain, again with Michael as her sighted companion.

The show is for sight impaired and sighted people. She is aided and abetted by Director Leah Cherniak who negotiates Alex Bulmer around Victoria Wallace’s efficient sent. In an interesting twist, Alex Bulmer has a line feeder, Enzo Massara He quietly reads the script into a microphone off to the side and the lines are fed to her by an ear piece. She then repeats the lines, effortlessly. He also engages in the narrative as an accommodating companion.

Does it work as theatre? It works beautifully. Alex Bulmer has charm, curiosity, a gentle self-deprecating humour and a keen ability to describe her world through sound, touch, music, smell and awareness of what is around her.  The beauty of this magical piece of theatre is not Alex Bulmer’s fearlessness and joy to travel and explore the world, as a blind woman. It’s that she has shown us how to look, see and experience our world in a more vibrant way.

Loved this piece.

Presented by Crow’s Theatre and Fire and Rescue Team.

Plays until June 25, 2023.

Running time: 90 minutes, (no intermission)

www.crowstheatre.com

{ 0 comments }

Live and in person, at the Berkeley Street Theatre, Toronto, Ont. Produced by Musical Stage Company in association with Canadian Stage. Plays until June 18, 2023.

www.canadianstage.com

Book by Sara Farb

Music and lyrics by Britta Johnson

Directed and choreographed by Tracey Flye

Music supervisor, orchestrator & arranger, Lynne Shankel

Musical Director, Jonathan Corkal-Astorga

Set and lighting by Lorenzo Savoini

Costumes by Alex Amini

Sound by Brian Kenny

Cast: Dave Ball

Joel Cumber

Peter Fernandes

Eva Foote

Mike Jackson

Julia McLellan

Jessica Sherman

Margaret Thompson

Kelsey Verzotti

Jeremy Walmsley

The Band: Jonathan Corkal-Astorga

Sasha Boychouk

Jessica Deutsch

Anna Atkinson

Erik Larson

Kelly v. Kelly is a musical still listed as in development. While the story is intriguing and the performances are dandy, the book needs another pass to shore up the two large holes in the narrative. Both Sara Farb (book) and Britta Johnson (music and lyrics) are fine creators of new work, Kelly v. Kelly needs more attention to the story to make it fly.

The Story. I first saw a workshop of this musical when it was being developed at the Canadian Musical Theatre Project at Sheridan College in which Michael Rubinoff was the Producing Artistic Director. The germ of an idea was there as was the buoyancy of the music and lyrics.  The version produced by Musical Stage Company in association with Canadian Stage has developed it further.

The press information of the story seems almost breathless: Inspired by true events from 1915 in New York, KELLY v. KELLY reveals the story of a mother and daughter divided by passion, money and what it means to be a woman at a time of huge societal change. When a 19-year-old heiress becomes tangled in an affair with a seductive tango dancer, her distraught mother has her arrested and charged with incorrigibility, sparking a court case that scandalizes the nation.”

Eugenia Kelly was always a dutiful daughter to her mother, Helen Kelly. Eugenia’s father and Helen’s husband, Edward died years before and we don’t know about Eugenia’s relationship with her father. But when Eugenia turned 19-years-old, she was introduced to a more interesting world by her society friends, namely, tango clubs and the men who taught and danced there for a fee. Eugenia became more independent and curious about the world and wanted to get out of the restrained world of her mother. She began an affair with Al Davis, one of the dancers who took a fancy to her. That’s when Eugenia’s mother took drastic measure and had her daughter arrested and charged with “incorrigibility” resulting in the court case.

The Production and comment. Lorenzo Savoini’s set of the courtroom is spare and efficient: the judge’s chair is up center and the prosecutor’s desk and the chair for Helen Kelly is stage left. Everybody but the accused is in court. She’s late. The Judge (Mike Jackson) is impatient. Helen’s lawyer (Joel Cumber) is high-strung and anxious. He wears a bespoke morning suit for court. His hair is slicked back. Helen Kelly (Jessica Sherman) is prim, refined and wears a blouse buttoned up to her neck and a dark grey respectable dress. This is a woman in which decorum is paramount. Nothing flashy or gaudy for her. Her hair is piled high on her head and held tightly in place. Restrained and confined defines Helen Kelly.

Finally, Eugenia Kelly (Eva Foote) arrives, hurrying down the aisle from the theatre, followed by a phalanx of excited reporters wanting a quote etc. She is carefree, wears a flowing dress that could be described as ‘flapper’ and is confident. She says she will defend herself.

The combination of book by Sara Farb and music and lyrics by Britta Johnson is an inspired fit. Both women are literate, gifted, intelligent and know how to mine the heart and mind of their characters. We get a sense of Helen’s life and position as a woman who remains silent and does not question decisions made for her, in the first two songs.

First, “Eugenia’s Entrance.” It is full of activity as Eugenia rushes down the aisle. Her mother remains silent and shocked at the display of the carefree enthusiasm of her daughter. Then “Chosen,” sung by Helen’s mother when Helen was herself 19 years old. Her mother taught Helen to be proper and act with decorum. And what great luck, Helen has been chosen by Edward Kelly of the very influential Kelly family, to be courted for the purpose of marriage. Helen’s mother was socially conscious of how such a match would elevate her and the family’s stature, or that is the impression we get so far. Edward Kelly is 42 years old. Helen as I said is 19. In 1915 no one questioned why a man of 42 years old was still unmarried when marriage was still desirable, or looked askance when he courted/married a woman of 19. From the dialogue we sense that it is Edward’s mother who is pulling the strings and nudging him towards marriage.  

Director Tracey Flye has directed that first meeting of Edward and Helen with effective nuance. Helen wore a lovely flower in her hair. Edward was prim and proper in his suit and tie. He noticed the flower with a little smile? Smirk?  “Is that a flower in your hair” he said? Then carefully took it out of her hair and held the flower. He did not put it in his button hole, he held it, seemingly looking for a place to discard it. Helen was young and inexperienced with this and didn’t know what to make of it. When he delicately took the flower out of her hair on their wedding day, with the same smirk, she frowned as if she had displeased him. Hers would be a life of frowning at such slights.

Helen finally gets her song when she sings “It Used to be Better” in which she recalls how life with her young daughter was wonderful and comforting. They played cards each evening. Her husband was long dead. Helen longs for those days when it used to be better between her and Eugenia.

Eugenia, in the meantime, is a young woman bursting to get out. She runs with a group of women, all free, all with money who are anxious to live an independent life without societal constraints. Suffragettes are agitating for independence for women, and not constrained by their husbands. Eugenia gets so deep into this life of independence, determination and tango dancing that her mother has a song at the end called “You Scare Me.” In that song Helen sings to Eugenia how her pure sense of freedom without restraint scares her. And one assumes leaves her jealous that she, Helen, never had the courage to break away from the societal, social constraints that dictated her life. Helen is wise enough to know that the tango dancer, Al Davis (Jeremy Walmsley) is not a good match for her daughter. We find out how unsuitable he is in court.

Eva Foote as Eugenia and Jessica Sherman as Helen are two powerhouse actor/singers. Eva Foote illuminates all the promise, enthusiasm and pluck of Eugenia. She seems to gulp air she is so hungry for life’s experiences. As Helen, Jessica Sherman is constrained in that somber garb, as if tightened and buttoned into it. She has never allowed herself to loosen up, even after her husband died. Both women sing beautifully. Eva Foote sings with confidence, conviction and determination, as a woman on the brink of taking her life in her hands would do. Jessica Sherman as Helen sings with power and regret at a life slipping by her.  

But for all the positive comments about Eva Foote and Jessica Sherman and the rest of the cast and the writing of Sara Farb and music and lyrics of Britta Johnson, I do have concerns about the piece as a whole.

Are we supposed to actually hear Britta Johnson’s lyrics? I ask because the sound of the microphoned band and that of the microphoned cast are at odds with each other, almost drowning each other out—and there are no horns or percussion in the band. Is it really that impossible to balance the sound in that small theatre?

There are tender moments in Tracey Flye’s direction, but her choreography is so busy and overpowering it’s hard to find a focus for the story. Kelly v. Kelly is not a big Broadway musical but from all the distracting choreography of the chorus in the background, one does get that impression that is what Tracey Flye is going for.

My biggest concern is that I think there are two holes in the narrative. The first concerns Edward Kelly. His appearance in the story is so late in the production—around 50 minutes into this 90 minute show—that his absence seems conspicuous. I think his presence or at least some information about him should be introduced sooner. Why is there so little narrative between Edward and Helen, or at least some inkling that she was not happy in that marriage. Missing her daughter is one thing, we need more information filled in to explain things. Helen had a fear of being left alone. Can one assume she was alone in that marriage? Please tell us more. We also find out late that Helen came from a notable family too—her uncle was the governor and his presence was wanted by Edward. When he didn’t show up, Edward was upset and so was Helen tangentially. While “Chosen” suggests that Helen is fortunate to have caught the eye of Edward, she in fact also had a pedigree that should be established earlier in the narrative.

The second hole in the narrative exists between Eugenia and Helen. Eugenia sees the world in a way Helen does not. What is missing is any kind of conversation between the two of them when the daughter explains her motives to her mother or at least sounds out her mother about her own choices. If Eugenia is rebelling, we need to know from what or whom she is rebelling and why. There is an indication at the end (no worries, I won’t spoil it) that Helen might be knowing when she smiles at her daughter, but that knowing smile is not supported really by any conversation between them. It’s as if Helen read Eugenia’s mind. We need something more substantial.

Again, Sara Farb and Britta Johnson are gifted writers. They excavate into the human heart and mind. And I have faith they can fill in holes too when needed. I’m looking forward to seeing Kelly v. Kelly again, when it’s finished.

Produced by Musical Stage Company in association with Canadian Stage

Plays until June 18, 2023.

Running Time: 90 minutes (no intermission)www.canadianstage.com

{ 0 comments }

I’m interviewing the wonderful Kate Hennig on Sat. June 10, at 9:00am on CRITICS CIRCLE, CIUT fm 89.5 about starring in GYPSY at the Shaw Festival. I’ll be asking her what it’s like to play Mama Rose, the mother of Gypsy Rose Lee. Please tune in.

{ 0 comments }

Live and in person at the Greenwin Theatre, Meridian Arts Centre, North York, Ont. Produced by the Harold Green Jewish Theatre.  Plays until June 11, 2023

www.hgjewishtheatre.com

Written by Ken Ludwig

Directed by David Eisner

Set by Brian Dudkiewicz

Lighting by Steve Lucas

Costumes by Alex Amini

Sound by Lyon Smith

Cast: Aris Athanasopoulos

Amy Keating

A courtship through letters written during the war between Jack Ludwig and Louise Rabiner, who would become the parents of playwright Ken Ludwig.

The Story. During WW II U.S. Army Captain Jacob S. Ludwig began writing letters to Louise Rabiner. He was stationed in Oregon.  She was an aspiring actress in New York City. Their fathers were friends and felt their two adult children would like each other and should ‘meet.’  They met and fell in love through letters and telegrams.  

He was known as ‘Jack’ and was serving in the army as a medical doctor. She was known as Louise and did a lot of auditioning as a dancer and then an actress. Jack sent the first letter—very formal, introducing himself and signing off as “U.S. Army Captain Jacob S. Ludwig” but would later write and say he is known as “Jack”.  Louise was more easygoing, more carefree in her letters. They wrote each other for three years before they actually met in person.

The Production. Director David Eisner has envisioned two separate spaces, nicely designed by Brian Dudkiewicz—one space stage right for Jack (Aris Athanasopoulos) with a simple metal desk, army issue, and one space for Louise (Amy Keating) stage left, with a writing desk a chair and several selections of dresses and a divider behind which she can change. Alex Amini’s dresses for Louise are stylish and bright-coloured.

They had been writing for several months when Louise suggested it was time they referred to each other by their first names. The letters told about themselves—Louise had to drag facts out of Jack. She was more forthcoming.

Initially each sat at their desks writing and speaking what they wrote. Eventually they either sat or stood in their sections, perhaps close to each other, verbalizing what they wrote. At times he didn’t write and that was because he had been called to see to tend to the wounded in the Pacific. Louise was worried something happened to him. But when he returned he was eager to allay her fears and explained he couldn’t write to her because the mission was a secret. They tried to meet in person a few times when Jack finally got leave but they were always thwarted. As the audience floats along with each eagerly anticipated letter, they felt the disappointment I’m sure as much as Jack and Louise when the war interfered with their meeting. The letters get more heartfelt. Emotions come easy as it’s obvious they are falling in love through their letters.

Both Aris Athanasopoulos as Jack and Amy Keating as Louise are two charming actors who bring a whole host of emotions to their performances under the sensitive and nuanced direction of David Eisner. Aris Athanasopoulos is courtly, boyish in a kind of formal way that eventually drops the formality. Amy Keating is the more fun-loving of the two, her emotions are closer to the surface.

Comment. If I do have a quibble, it’s with the piece itself. At 1 hour and 45 minutes divided over two acts it seems a bit thin in Act I and loaded with emotion and huge implications in Act II. I think Ken Ludwig would have had a stronger piece if he condensed the work to one Act and tightened the various revelations.

Ken Ludwig is considered one of the American Theatre’s finest comedic playwrights having written: Lend Me a Tenor, Moon Over Broadway and Crazy For You to name a few. Still Dear Jack, Dear Louise harkens back to a time when people actually took the time to write to loved ones, expressing their affections, inner most thoughts and dreams, with nary a ‘Facebook’ post or heart-emoji Tweet in sight. My quibble aside, it’s a sweet play, done very well.

The Harold Green Jewish Theatre presents:

Plays until June 11, 2023.

Running time: 1 hour, 45 minutes (1 intermission)

www.hgjewishtheatre.com

{ 0 comments }

Live and in person at the Studio Theatre, Stratford Festival, Stratford, Ont. Plays until June 17, 2023.

www.stratfordfestival.ca

Written by Nick Green

Directed by Andrew Kushnir

Designed by Joshua Quinlan

Lighting by Louise Guinand

Composer and sound by Debashis Sinha

Cast: Sean Arbuckle

Laura Condlln

Linda Kash

Davinder Malhi

Krystin Pellerin

Sophia Walker

A cathartic, deeply moving play about living and dying with AIDS, with burst out loud laughs when you least expect it, with a stunning performance by Sean Arbuckle. The production is beautifully directed by Andrew Kushnir.

The Story. Casey House is a specialty hospice in Toronto caring for people with Human Immunodeficiency Viruses (HIV). The play takes place in 1991 before the cocktail of drugs was discovered that could control HIV and prologue the life of those infected with HIV. At that point there was nothing to be done but make the patient feel comfortable until they inevitably died.

One such patient is Thomas. He has been at Casey House for five months and he is nearing the end. But the patients have been told of an upcoming event that changes their lives—a royal visit from Princess Diana. Thomas is buoyed by the prospect of the visit. He is ready to meet her.  

The Production. There is a box of Kleenex on the counter outside the theatre auditorium. It will be needed. We are told at the end of the production there is a comfort room with someone to talk to should a person need it.

Joshua Quinlan has designed a comfortable looking room with two beds. This is not a typical ‘hospital room.’ There are vibrant coloured bed coverings on each bed. There is a window up center that can be opened or closed behind one of the beds. This is Thomas’s bed. To the left of that room is an alcove with a desk. It’s a nurse’s station of sorts.

The other bed is by the stage right wall, perpendicular to it. There are two chairs in the room.

At the top of the production, Thomas (Sean Arbuckle) is laying in bed. There is a lesion on the side of his bald head. A woman in a pink suit stands downstage, her back to us, looking up stage at Sean. The tilt of the head conveys that it’s Princess Diana (Krystin Pellerin).  She is formally introduced by a nurse, Vera (Sophia Walker).

As Thomas, Sean Arbuckle sits up in his bed, delighted to see this icon he has revered since she came on the scene to marry into the royal family. He puts out his hand to shake and realizes this might be too forward. He says with a hint of hope, “I heard you touch people.” The point is of course that people hesitated to touch a person with HIV. Diana goes towards him without hesitation and shakes his hand firmly and holds it. It’s a moment of stunning kindness and humanity.

Thomas breathlessly tells her about her wedding day, in great detail. It’s a speech filled with the joy of the event and the recall of the details of the dress, the crowds, her poise. It’s a speech that goes on and on, to the point that I wonder if she will get a word in edgewise. But of course, patience is needed for playwright Nick Green to layout the play; to recollect memories; to wonder if this is real or imagined. For the recollection Krystin Pellerin as Diana, calmly listens to Thomas’ memory. She kneels deeply close by the bed. She sits on it, first with her back to the audience, then moves to the other side and sits beside him, facing the audience. She says little but when she does, it’s with a gentle English accent, total concentration of what he is saying and tremendous care.

The play moves back and forth during that time when the news that Diana is set to visit Casey House in a week and will visit the rooms of each patient. Playwright Nick Green presents this news in a wonderful way. Vera tells her patients that Diana will visit in seven days (not a week). The number of days gives the patients something to hold on to; to tick off on a calendar as the days go by; to note they lived one more day until they could meet her. The impending visit had a great effect on the patients of Casey House. They rallied; took care to shave and be clean; to move; to hope. Stunning.

Sharing Thomas’ room is Andre (Davinder Malhi) an angry, unsettled young man who has just arrived and is fearful his mother will find out.  Vera is a matter-of-fact nurse and is beautifully played by Sophia Walker. She is all business but is compassionate. She has been at this job for a long time and knows how fragile emotionally the patients are. Contrasting her is Marjorie (Linda Kash) a cheerful volunteer who blurs the lines between being helpful and breaking rules to be compassionate. Rounding out the cast is Laura Condlln at Pauline, Thomas’ estranged sister. She said hateful things to him as a gay man. For much of the play she won’t touch him. She asks the questions one might ask today: why is her brother still in Casey House five months after moving in? Why can’t he come and live with her and have her take care of him? (a horrible thought). What Pauline doesn’t understand is that at the time there was no cocktail of drugs to prolong an HIV patient’s life. If one went into Casey House they generally were not coming out. Laura Condlln does not shy away from the uglier parts of Pauline’s character. She is blinkered, cruel, often homophobic and clueless about what her brother is going through. Laura Condlln gives a blistering performance as Pauline.

In a moving scene the personas of the compassionate Princess Diana and Pauline who finds her own compassion, meld and comfort Thomas, holding his hand.  

Director Andrew Kushnir has used the space of this small stage beautifully. He has ensured that every person in that audience sees every moment without obstruction. There are chairs located in the room, but they are rarely used, because the visitors sit on the bed or stand close to it, indicating that the visitors care deeply for these patients.

Comment. Thirty-three years after this event playwright Nick Green has written a play that celebrates the patients who just wanted a little dignity as they came to the end of their lives; the nurses who tended them as best they could and the volunteers who brought their own reasons for being there to help. It’s cathartic for people who lost loved ones. I heard sobbing from those in their senior years and those much younger. Be prepared. Bring Kleenex.  

The Stratford Festival presents:

Opened: June 1, 2023

Runs until June 17, 2023

Running time: 2:45 (1 intermission)

www.stratfordfestival.ca

{ 0 comments }

Live and in person at the Stratford Festival, Stratford, Ont. Playing until Oct. 29, 2023.

www.stratfordfestival.ca

Written by William Shakespeare

Directed by Kimberley Rampersad

Set by Judith Bowden

Costumes by Michelle Bohn

Lighting by Chris Malkowski

Composer, Sean Mayes

Sound by Miquelon Rodriguez

Supervising Fight Director, Geoff Scovell

Cast: Michael Blake

Richard Comeau

Déjah Dixon-Green

Austin Eckert

Jakob Ehman

Paul Gross

Andrew Iles

David W. Keeley

John Kirkpatrick

Josue Laboucane

Devin MacKinnon

Patrick McManus

Antony Santiago

André Sills

Tara Sky

Shannon Taylor

Gordon Patrick White

Rylan Wilkie

A generally eye-brow knitting production with seemingly deliberate laughs inserted that up-ends the play. Paul Gross is a vibrant, energetic, confident King Lear definitely playing against the character’s age.

The Story. King Lear has divided his kingdom among his three daughters, Goneril, Regan and Cordelia. He has done this before the play begins. We learn this at the very top of the production when two courtiers, Kent and Gloucester, talk about the division that has taken place. King Lear then announces this decision in open court, professing old age, and wanting to divest himself of the care and worry of ruling.

But before he parcels out the land, he has his daughters play a game. Each daughter has to tell him how much she loves him first, as if it depends on what parcel he will give her. Cordelia is the last to be asked. She is introduced as “our Joy” and Lear says tell me how much you love me and you’ll get a portion 1/3 better than your sisters’. Right away we see the meanness of the game. I don’t get the sense this is the first time he’s played the game on Goneril and Regan. This might be the first time with Cordelia because she tells him she hasn’t got anything to say to the question of how much do I love you.

King Lear says, famously, “Nothing will come of nothing. Speak again.” She tells him she loves him like a dutiful daughter. King Lear is still not happy. Cordelia has two suitors and Lear asks them to decide who will take her off his hands. That sets into motion all manner of discord in the court, between the other two daughters, etc. King Lear planned to divide the land among the daughters and to visit each daughter once a month with 100 knights. And in a sense, still rule, but be taken care of by each daughter while he does it. That too is in jeopardy.

I call King Lear mean because he’s deliberately playing each daughter against the others for his own ego, even though he’s already divided the land.

The first line of the play proves this. Kent says to Gloucester “I thought the King had more affected the Duke of Albany than Cornwall.” Meaning, on the basis of the division, Kent thought that the king liked Albany (Goneril’s husband) more than Cornwall, (Regan’s husband). Gloucester then says that it looked like it initially but then he saw that the land was divided absolutely fairly. Thus, proving that the game was rigged to begin with pertaining to the daughters…the land was already divided evenly, so what’s with this game?

I will also add that King Lear is an abusive father to play these cruel games with his daughters. It should be no mystery where you get scheming daughters like Goneril and Regan, with a father like King Lear. And he hates to be challenged. When King Lear is challenged as Kent does when Lear banishes Cordelia, Lear rages against him. When Lear is later challenged by his daughters about why he needs so many knights with him, he says, “reason not the need.” Meaning “I NEED THEM” and don’t ask why. When Goneril and Regan challenge him, King Lear can’t cope. He believes he is going mad. Worse than getting old is going mad or insane. The play progresses from there until King Lear has to hit rock bottom until he realizes that Cordelia was in fact loving, loyal and true.

The Production. Director Kimberley Rampersad seems to have envisioned a post-apocalyptic world with Judith Bowden’s set composed of overpowering walls that crunch and grind when they move, with accompanying crackling florescent bulbs along some walls.

Michelle Bohn’s costumes suggest some kind of otherworldly design of startling, formfitting, costumes in vibrant colours for Goneril (Shannon Taylor) and Regan (Déjah Dixon-Green), more flowing dresses in pastels for Cordelia (Tara Sky), black garb for the courtiers and the most stylish tailored shirts for King Lear (Paul Gross).

I found the production interesting, odd, and even very funny. I never anticipated so much humour before and it was by accident. I’m pretty sure it’s not a good idea.

Kimberley Rampersad who has directed fascinating smaller productions at the Shaw Festival such as O’Flaherty, V.C. and Chitra. But larger work such as Man and Superman at the Shaw Festival and Serving Elizabeth at Stratford last year were problematic in concept and in direction. Her ideas for King Lear were eye-brow knitting.

King Lear says frequently that he’s crawling towards death and that he’s old with lots of repetition of the word “old”. But Paul Gross, at 64 is not old, not playing old, and not attempting apparently to play old. He’s playing a fit, robust, energetic and impish man in full command of all his faculties both physical and mental. He does not stop moving, with purpose, energy and resolve. He handles the language beautifully and plays games with the language at the get go.

When he says he’s crawling towards death, he over accentuates the word deaaaaaaaaath, so that he’s making a joke of it. He’s not being ironic. He’s being sarcastic. I can only assume this is a decision between director and actor. My question is why? How is the play served here?

I also found this to be the funniest production of King Lear I have ever seen. Again, this seems deliberate. When the Duke of Cornwall (Rylan Wilkie) violently takes out the eyeballs of Gloucester (Anthony Santiago), there’s lots of gushing of fluid and plopping of an eye-ball on the floor. Great ‘ewwwwww’ factor from the audience. Immediately after this a courtier is seen crawling, wiping the floor with a rag to get up the glop, and then crawling off to the side exit.  The audience laughed out loud. Really? After several previews the cause of that laugh wouldn’t have been apparent? Then I can only conclude that laugh is deliberate. It takes the audience out of the horrific moment. The audience does not need comic relief. They need to be kept in the horror as it builds and builds.

Director Kimberley Rampersad also embellishes romantic subtext between Goneril and her servant Oswald (Devin MacKinnon). The subtext is there in the text. Rampersad feels the need to ramp it up.

Goneril is giving an important speech as a soliloquy about Lear and her sister Regan and behind her is her servant Oswald (Devin MacKinnon) putting a necklace around her neck. He’s not her dresser. This looks like a present a lover gives. We are to believe Goneril will wear the necklace for the whole production without her husband, the Duke of Albany (Austin Eckert) actually seeing it. Why? To show how dim her husband is?  He’s not.

We don’t see any development of this relationship for much of the production. Then much later when Goneril wants to toy with Oswald’s affections using Edmund (Michael Blake), Goneril takes off the necklace, with great show, and holds it out to Edmund, who’s favour she wants. She takes a moment, then looks back at Oswald, smiling at him suggesting she’s dumping his favours for a new lover. This too got a laugh.

Isn’t the play hard enough to decipher without creating extra attention-grabbing subtext when subtlety generally works just as effectively? Shakespeare does a nice job depicting Goneril and Regan as mean, damaged women. These extra bits of business suggests that Rampersad doesn’t think that’s enough.

On the heath, in the storm scene when Lear is truly going mad and he meets “Poor Tom”, actually Edger (André Sills) in disguise as a mad man, there are also lots of other shrouded beings scurrying around. I’m thinking, who are they? Did they get misdirected from Macbeth to King Lear by mistake. Again, eye-brow-knitting.

Directing on the Festival thrust stage is a challenge even for any accomplished director, let alone a director new to the space, as Kimberley Rampersad is. You have to stage and direct for the whole space so that all areas of the audience can see and hear what is going on. So, while those in the center of the audience could see perfectly,  I wonder if those on the extreme left and right aisles could see the verbal exchange at the beginning of the production, when Gloucester and Kent (David W. Keeley) have their first speech, because both are talking upstage-centre, half-hidden by a pillar. Often many actors are facing upstage to deliver their lines. Audibility is a problem in many cases.

That said, I was grateful for Paul Gross’s confident handling of the language, in spite of his not playing Lear old. I was grateful also for Shannon Taylor as a strong, driven Goneril; David W. Keeley as a bold Kent; Andre Sills as a trusting, but then commanding Edgar; Michael Blake as a wily Edmund and Rylan Wilkie as a venomous Cornwall. They all handled the poetry and language with confidence.

I thought it a wonderful stroke for Kimberley Rampersad to cast Gordon Patrick White as the Fool. Gordon Patrick White is Indigenous and his casting in this part added a layer of complexity—that the Fool is also a mournful trickster. I thought that was inspired casting.

The fight, by Geoff Scovell the Supervising Fight Director, with axe and sword between Edmund and Edgar at the end of the production, was chilling and death defying. So, the production is not without a lot of positive points.

It’s just that the overall effect is uneven in concept and while it tries to re-image the play in a ‘new’ way, I don’t think the actual production serves the play.  

Comment. There is a discernible divide between actors who are comfortable with Shakespeare’s language (perhaps because they have studied it formally, either in theatre school or a conservatory) and those who struggle to make the language and poetry sound like comfortable conversation. The Stratford Festival offers all of its actors the opportunity to delve into Shakespeare’s language by hearing it, playing and perfecting it.

Purists will insist that the language, meter and proper pronunciation must conform to the strict rules of iambic pentameter. Which brings us to the word “revenue” (income). Following the form of iambic pentameter, the word is pronounced with the accent on the middle syllable so that the word follows the rhythm and meter of the poetry. But if the word is in a line of prose, then the word is pronounced with the accent on the last syllable.

But language and pronunciation are always changing in this changing world.  In King Lear the decision was made to pronounce the word “revenue,” regardless of its use in poetry or prose, with the accent on the last syllable. Does it change the meaning of the word? No. Do most people (not purists) notice? Probably not. Does it make understanding the language clearer? Probably.  Language is always in flux. Purists, please deal with it.

The Stratford Festival Presents:

Plays until Oct. 29.

Running time: 2 hours 55 minutes. (1 intermission)

www.stratfordfestival.ca

{ 2 comments }

Live and in person at the Red Sandcastle Theatre 922 Queen St. E., Toronto, Ont. Plays until June 4, 2023.

www.redsandcastletheatre.com

Book, additional lyrics by Evan Tsitsias

Music by Rosalind Mills

Lyrics by Alexis Diamond

Additional music/lyrics by Julia Appleton

Directed by Evan Tsitsias

Music supervisor/music director, Kieren MacMillan

Choreographer, Jen Cohen

Set/costumes by Irene Ly

Lighting by Rachel Shaen

Cast: Mairi Babb

Cory O’Brien

Elora Joy Sarmiento

Astrid Van Wieren

As an old tv show once began, “There are 8 million stories in the naked city.” Seemingly putting them all in a musical is not a good idea.

Writer/director Evan Tsitsias has said in his programme note to INGE(NEW) that he hates rules that restrict us. He tries to break them whenever he can. He hates the slots that we are put in, that define us, or others define us etc. All good. His intention, it would seem is that the musical  INGE(NEW) is trying to break that form of deciding who should play what and that a new model might be in order. This is a good germ of an idea for a play/musical. INGE(NEW) misses in achieving it, good intentions and programme note notwithstanding.

Bridget (Mairi Babb) is about to turn 40-years-old. She is auditioning for a musical, as the ingenue. It’s a part (the ingenue) she has played often. She’s good at it. Of course, she should continue auditioning for such parts. But she can’t find anyone to talk to about issues. When she’s about to begin singing she stops and asks a question. “Is anybody out there?” Silence. She tries again to begin singing the audition song and can’t. And again, and can’t. The attempts to sing and the questions, lead one to believe that perhaps she can’t sing. She’s lost the ability. Something.

Joy (Elora Joy Sarmiento) enters, also ready to audition. Bridget thinks she’s there to be a reader or a scene partner. In fact, Joy is also reading for the ingenue part. There are smarmy, cutting comments from both to the other. Joy’s youth emphasizes that perhaps Bridget is not the ingenue type any more.

Gertrude arrives. She’s older, flamboyant, effervescent and larger than life. She’s auditioning for the part of the mother, a part she has perfected. Bridget reminds Gertrude that in the past she played Gertrude’s daughter. Does Gertrude believe Bridget is now auditioning for the ‘mother’ part? Can Gertrude believe that Bridget is auditioning for the ingenue? It’s all a game of not showing your hand or vulnerabilities.

Then Max arrives to audition for the macho man part. Matters get tricky. Bridget and Max used to be married. Max is now living with Joy. She thinks he’s much younger than what he really is—in his early 40s.

We then go into the real lives of the characters. Bridget is getting older and has to face it, but she’s not ready to accept she should audition for the mother roles. Joy may be pregnant (the character she’s auditioning for is pregnant). Gertrude, for all her good humour, is soul searching her place as well. Then the lines between the characters and their real lives start to blur, blend and cross.

All the while Bridget tries to find the director or someone to talk question. There are only sound effects of crackling electricity as if perhaps they are all held captive there in some place of restricted limbo. Then the sound of a voice in the void is heard. It’s the writer. The actors complain about the parts. The writer says he will change some of it, but there is still the issue of age and types of parts (ingenue, mother etc.).

Bridget sings about wanting to break out of the rut, of not being slotted in one part or another, that there has to be a new model.

This is all very well and good, but INGE(NEW) doesn’t offer the new model or the solution. Bridget instantly has a change of heart and now realizes she can’t play ingenues anymore and will embrace the older parts because they have the best lines and are funny. This is a revelation that needs more development.  It comes from nowhere that is not supported.

Evan Tsitsias’ book has many interesting ideas tries to explore; ageism, formulaic departments of parts; personal vs. professional life; children or not; marriage or not; rut in a career. But the 90 minute piece feels lumbered with all these issues when a more streamlined show would better serve a few of the more important issues. Editing is in order. A list of songs would be helpful for context. The first song is deliberately simplistic while the others try to be more sophisticated and knowing. And with so many people writing lyrics cohesion is problematic.

The cast lead by Mairi Babb is terrific. Ms Babb came into the production eight days after another cast member had to leave for personal reasons. Ms Babb does Herculean work. She is a fine actor who illuminates all the insecurities of an actor getting older than ingenue parts, and conveys the worry of what that means. And she sings beautifully

Elora Joy Sarmiento as Joy is sweet, winning, and can hold her own in the hard world of theatre. She too sings beautifully and conveys the optimism and pluck of Joy. Cory O’Brien as Max is the quintessential dashing male lead. They never seem to have an aging problem while women are too often slotted into ‘types.’

Astrid Van Wieren as Gertrude is bold and brassy and pulls off the larger than life mother of all mothers, with panache.

As I’ve said, there are good ideas here to explore. Another try, edit is in order.

Theatre Myth Collective presents:

Plays until June 4, 2023

Running Time: 90 minutes (no intermission)

www.redsandcastletheatre.com

Stuff that might be helpful:

Please put the name of the theatre where you are playing on the cover of your programme or what passes for one. The Red Sandcastle Theatre is no where on your printed programme except as a ‘thank you’ at the back.

Please have a phone number or some contact info for tickets on the programme.

Please put the dates of your run in your program, ideally on the cover page.

{ 0 comments }

Live and in person at the Shaw Festival, Festival Theatre, Niagara-on-the-Lake, Ont. Playing until Oct. 7, 2023.

www.shawfest.com

Book by Arthur Laurents

Music by Jule Stein, lyrics by Stephen Sondheim

Suggested by the memoirs of Gypsy Rose Lee

Directed by Jay Turvey

Music direction by Paul Sportelli

Choreographed by Genny Sermonia

Set and costumes by Cory Sincennes

Lighting by Kevin Fraser

Sound by John Lott

Cast: Ariana Abudaqa

Andi Biancaniello

Jason Cadieux

Krystle Chance

Wren Evans

Kristi Frank

Élodie Gillett

Kyle Golemba

Damian Gradson

Kate Hennig

Allan Louis

Julie Lumsden

Kevin McLauchlan

Mike Nadajewski

Hannah Otta

Drew Plummer

Shakeil Rollock

Jaqueline Thair

And a large chorus

A fine production with a stellar performance of Kate Hennig as Mama Rose.

The Story. The book is by Arthur Laurents. The music is by Jule Styne, lyrics by Stephen Sondheim who was 29 when he wrote them.

The musical is suggested by the memoirs of Gypsy Rose Lee who was a burlesque star, stripper, also a writer. But while it’s called Gypsy the story is really about Rose. She was the quintessential stage mother. She pushed and pushed her two daughters, June and Louise, to perform and be in showbusiness.

Baby June was the star of the act, singing, dancing, gymnastics. Louise, her older sister by one year, always played supporting roles in the act. June was preferred and Louise was overlooked, until June had enough of playing children and eloped with one of the chorus boys in the act. Rose just transferred her attention to Louise in the hopes she could carry on her mother’s dreams of a career in show business.

They were accidentally booked into a burlesque house with strippers, which horrified Rose. The burlesque theatre needed a stripper quickly because the one they had was just arrested for soliciting. Louise was pushed into that role and was accidentally introduced as Gypsy Rose Lee.  She was awkward and frightened but she did it.  That led to other jobs until her career and confidence grew and so did her notoriety. This led to a contretemps with her mother.

The Production. Cory Sincennes’ sets of various backstages are appropriately dingy, capturing the gloom, dust and disrepair of the backstage of an American vaudeville theatre. The language of the backstage hands is vulgar, loud and impatient.

Jocko (Allan Louis) is involved with a talent contest that he will rig so that a young girl covered in balloons will win, to get the ‘favour’ of the girl’s mother. Also entered in this talent show is Baby June (Ariana Abudaqa) and her sister, Louise (Hannah Otta). When it’s their turn to sing, their mother, Rose, (Kate Hennig) calls out from the theatre as she walks down the aisle to the stage, to “sing out” and other instructions. When she gets on stage she instructs the lighting man to ‘hit Baby June with a pink light’, as Jocko instructed him to do to the balloon girl, thus giving her an advantage. Rose instructs the orchestra on the tempo for the music. It’s all very efficient and with a smile. She takes an objecting Jocko to the side and lets him know she’s wise to his scheme to get balloon girl to win and she won’t stand for it.

Rose is such a huge part—full of star power and human frailty. She’s a woman whom her daughter Louise says “Could have been a star.” And the wise Rose says, “If I coulda been, I woulda been, and that’s showbusiness.”  The intriguing thing about Rose is that she probably did not have (singing) talent, and yet is consistently played by power-house women with singing talent who could act: Ethel Merman, Angela Lansbury, Tyne Daily, Imelda Staunton, Patti LuPone, Bette Midler for example.

Rose keeps having new ideas about ‘the act’ for her children, but it’s the same act with a different name. The dialogue for the act is cheesy. Rose is deluded and determined to promote her children as young girls, even though they are young women. She won’t be told, even by her children. She is living a dream vicariously of show-biz success for her children. If they get attention then so does she and she craves it. She felt abandoned, first by her mother, then her husbands and finally by June, when she ran off with one of the chorus boys in the act. Now she puts all her hopes on Louise, who she knew was there, but did not shower with attention—she did remember her birthday.

When Louise begins to come into her own on her own as Gypsy Rose Lee, she distances herself from her mother. In time she tried to leave her mother behind—there was a sign at the stage door that Rose was not to be allowed back stage. They have a row which results in the great show stopper “Rose’s Turn” in which Rose gets her star turn even if it’s in her imagination. Rose’s brilliance in that song is seen by her daughter, in the wings. She sees her mother’s ambition and gives that famous line “You could have been a star, Mama.” And Rose replies, “If I coulda been, I woulda been. And that’s show business.” The truth is revealed, at last, that drives her. The hope of regaining her lost chance at stardom is transferred to her children. What pressure for everybody.  

Playing all the facets of Rose is a tricky proposition. We’ve seen singers who act, play Rose (Bette Midler, Bernadette Peters, etc.) We’ve seen actors who sing play Rose (Angela Lansbury, Patti LuPone, Imelda Staunton).  Kate Hennig is an actor who can sing, all gloriously. She plays Rose with such determination, such nuance and drive, it’s a thing of beauty. When Rose marches down that aisle of the theatre in the first scene, she is committed to her children but not over powering initially. She does not start at level 10 of power. She builds up to it.  Her mind is always working to improve a situation, or change one. She thinks some curtains will make a nice coat—next thing she’s wearing a coat made of the curtains. She always gets ideas when something strikes her.

She meets a kind candy salesman backstage, chats him up, finds out his name is Herbie (Jason Cadieux) and that he was an agent and charms him into being their agent. Hennig plays Rose with a smile, charm, a salesperson’s wiliness and sheer, unstoppable optimism. When June left it was a low point for Rose—another person leaves her—but she then makes that negative into a positive by now focusing on Louise. She sings “Everything’s Coming Up Roses.” The lyric is telling and we clearly get the reason when she sings: “Everything’s coming up roses for me (bold and italics are mine) and for you.” It’s Rose who is living vicariously through her children and she will not be shunted aside.  She always has a plan.

Hennig can also sing. It’s a strong, powerful voice. She realizes the nuance and shading in the lyrics and shows us their and her beating heart. In “Rose’s Turn”, is she imagining this star turn on that deserted stage, her name in lights and bold letters? The arms are out, waiting for applause. We give it. She looks thrilled and confused as if so say, “Am I imagining this applause? This adulation? Please don’t stop.”

In the backstage world of grunge, yelling, dust, and guarding one’s space, the appearance of Herbie, the accommodating candy salesman, is a breath of fresh air. Jason Cadieux plays Herbie with grace, courtliness and sweetness. Herbie is a mensch, a decent man who just wants to love Rose and her daughters and live a normal life. Rose does not want that life enough.

As Louise (Gypsy), Julie Lumsden is beautifully introverted, almost folding into herself, when she is second banana to June, but comes into her own as Gypsy. She gains poise, subtlety and the confidence to be coy and alluring. In a profession (stripping) that needed a gimmick to be noticed and rise above the others, Gypsy Rose Lee’s gimmick was that at all times, she was a lady. She left her audiences wanting more and didn’t give it to them.

Jay Turvey has directed this with confidence and keen eye to capture the squalor and lack of glamour of vaudeville and later burlesque. He realizes the many and various relationships of people who just want to be noticed and how devastating that is when they aren’t. A fine production of this deeply felt musical.

Comment. Rose did something right. She pushed her two children to be notable in the theatre in their own way and they succeeded. Louise became Gypsy Rose Lee who was not just a stripper (or ecdysiast as she put it), but one with brains and alure, and a frequent guest on talk shows of the day. She wrote successful books and had her own television show. Her sister June was June Havoc who became an actress, director and writer. June Havoc played the Royal Alexandra Theatre in 1982, as Mrs. Lovett opposite Ross Petty in Sweeney Todd, the demon barber of Fleet Street. Talented women who had a determined stage mother pushing them. The stuff of musicals.

The Shaw Festival presents:

Plays until Oct. 7, 2023.

Running time: 3 hours, approx. (1 intermission)

www.shawfest.com

{ 0 comments }